Meta - Revision history

Checker at 06:32, 10 July 2010

2010-07-10T06:32:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:32, 10 July 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I'll post details about it once it's stable for a few days.		I'll post details about it once it's stable for a few days.


	----		----

Checker at 06:31, 10 July 2010

2010-07-10T06:31:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:31, 10 July 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->		<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->

			----

			23:31, 9 July 2010 (PDT)

			Okay, after a day and a half, I think I have varnish working, and man, it really is blazingly fast compared to raw apache httpd, even with php APC turned on. Like, hundreds of times faster.

			I'll post details about it once it's stable for a few days.


	----		----

Checker at 07:46, 9 July 2010

2010-07-09T07:46:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 9 July 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->		<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->

			----

			00:46, 9 July 2010 (PDT)

			I'm trying to get the Varnish cache working, so things may be a bit wonky for a while. Thanks for your patience.

			Chris

	----		----

Checker at 21:09, 13 May 2010

2010-05-13T21:09:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 13 May 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->		<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->

			----

			14:09, 13 May 2010 (PDT)

			Does anybody seeing this use Thunderbird as their feed reader and get dupe updates of all the posts on my site every couple of days? If so, [[About/Me\|send me mail]] please, I'm really hoping I fixed it this time (last time I fixed the dates on all the posts in the feed to their actual modification date as opposed to the feed generation date, and then that didn't really fix it, and this time I made the http headers in the feed have a Last-Modified date).

			Thanks,
			Chris

	----		----

Checker at 23:49, 6 May 2010

2010-05-06T23:49:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 6 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''This Meta page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''		''This Meta page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''

			<!-- insert 5x~ to get date -->

			----

			16:49, 6 May 2010 (PDT)

			OMG, I think I finally fixed the timestamp bug in the WikiFeeds extension I use. '''Sorry for the RSS/Atom spam over the past few days, but it should be over now''', and the articles should actually be marked with when they were actually written, not when the feed cache was invalidated. This means Thunderbird will not redownload all the articles every couple hours. It also means Google Reader is kind of confused, since it seems to cache across users, in that cloudy sort of way. No idea what it will do, but I assume it will still get new articles, like this one when I set it to go out on the feed.

			Note to self: I need to put all my fixes for WikiFeeds up at some point. And my custom MediaWiki skin.

	----		----

Checker at 06:54, 6 May 2010

2010-05-06T06:54:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 6 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''This Meta<ref>I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references. Or, at least it did. They should have left it like that.</ref> page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''		''This Meta page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''

	----		----
Line 8:		Line 8:

	----		----

	~~<references/>~~

Checker at 06:48, 6 May 2010

2010-05-06T06:48:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 6 May 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	----		----

	06:17, ~~2 January 2008~~ (~~PST~~)		23:48, 5 May 2010 (PDT)

	I ~~think a) there is a problem with the feeds~~, and b) I ~~think I found~~ it. ~~I need to double check~~, but I think ~~the WikiFeeds extension~~ I'~~m using isn't computing~~ the ~~'updated' tag right for minor edits on Atom~~, or ~~for any edits on~~ the ~~RSS feed (less sure about that last one). Sorry for the annoyance if minor edits are showing up in your~~ feeds. ~~I'll fix it soon.~~		I'm moving servers, which means backing up and restoring my Mediawiki and all its pieces, and I'm also upgrading it to the current version. A lot of stuff broke, but I think I've fixed it all. Please [[About/Me\|email me]] if you see something wrong with the site, or the feeds, or whatever. Thanks!

	----		----

	~~04:12, 12 June 2007 (PDT)~~

	~~Okay, I think I'm crack-smoking...the feed and the list seem fine. Hmm, I do think I probably need to provide unique links in the feeds to work with for edits, now that I think about it...~~

	~~----~~

	~~03:59, 12 June 2007 (PDT)~~

	Hmm, minor edits are showing up in both the [[Recent Changes\|recent changes list]] and the [http://chrishecker.com/Special:WikiFeeds/atom/recentarticlechanges feeds]. Need to figure out why. Sorry about that.

	Also, if you're subscribed to the "newarticles" feed, you really want to switch to the "recentarticlechanges" feed on the [[Subscribe]] page, so it will catch edits. My original subscription page was ambiguous about which one to join, but now it should be clear. Of course, the fact that the minor edits are showing up is slightly undermining my advice here, but I'll fix that shortly.

	<references/>		<references/>

Checker at 14:17, 2 January 2008

2008-01-02T14:17:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 2 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''This Meta<ref>I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references. Or, at least it did. They should have left it like that.</ref> page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''		''This Meta<ref>I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references. Or, at least it did. They should have left it like that.</ref> page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''

			----

			06:17, 2 January 2008 (PST)

			I think a) there is a problem with the feeds, and b) I think I found it. I need to double check, but I think the WikiFeeds extension I'm using isn't computing the 'updated' tag right for minor edits on Atom, or for any edits on the RSS feed (less sure about that last one). Sorry for the annoyance if minor edits are showing up in your feeds. I'll fix it soon.

	----		----

Checker at 12:32, 9 August 2007

2007-08-09T12:32:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 9 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''This page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]]~~.''~~		''This Meta<ref>I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references. Or, at least it did. They should have left it like that.</ref> page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''

	~~''I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references~~.''

	----		----
Line 16:		Line 14:

	Also, if you're subscribed to the "newarticles" feed, you really want to switch to the "recentarticlechanges" feed on the [[Subscribe]] page, so it will catch edits. My original subscription page was ambiguous about which one to join, but now it should be clear. Of course, the fact that the minor edits are showing up is slightly undermining my advice here, but I'll fix that shortly.		Also, if you're subscribed to the "newarticles" feed, you really want to switch to the "recentarticlechanges" feed on the [[Subscribe]] page, so it will catch edits. My original subscription page was ambiguous about which one to join, but now it should be clear. Of course, the fact that the minor edits are showing up is slightly undermining my advice here, but I'll fix that shortly.

			<references/>

Checker at 11:18, 12 June 2007

2007-06-12T11:18:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 12 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''This page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content. I will ~~occasionally~~ move stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''		''This page is for discussing [[About/Website \| my website]] and updates to it. It's not actual content, or at least it's not likely to be very interesting content, but it is hopefully stuff that is useful to visitors, so I'll mark updates to it so they show up in the feed occasionally. I will move old stuff from this page to [[Meta/Archive]].''

	''I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references.''		''I find it quite humorous that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta Wikipedia page defining Meta] has the standard Wikipedia content warning for pages with no references.''